The Play's the Thing
/I don’t go to many plays. I’ve mentioned my wish that this weren’t so, along with my concern that it is a dying art form, particularly in my fair city. That was a tad sensationalist. So, it was with great anticipation that I went to see Company One’s Boston theater premier of Haruki Murakami’s short story collection After the Quake – as adapted by Frank Galati.
Prior to this week, I’d only ever read The Wind Up Bird Chronicle – a strange, strange book that mixes mystery, relationships, WWII, mysticism … you name it. It meanders around a storyline (or a dozen storylines) and you lose your place and then can’t seem to forget it.
So, a play adaptation of Murakami – with his constant interweaving of reality and its counterparts – sounded interesting. BCA Plaza Theatre is a nice little place in the South End with about 140 seats. (Right next door you can get really delicious fries and drinks at the Beehive.) The play mixed two stories from the After the Quake collection: “Honey Pie” and “Super-Frog Saves Tokyo.” One a little more grounded in reality than the other, so I thought they were a good combination.
Murakami wrote this collection of short stories after the earthquake that hit Kobe, Japan in 1995. The “Kobe Earthquake” was at a 6.9 magnitude and killed approximately 5,500 and injured 36,896 people. In writing the stories, Murakami set some guidelines: All had to be related to the earthquake but none could take place in Kobe or during the actual event. They also had to be written in the third person. Now, this last bit clears up something about the play. Yes, there was a narrator for both stories, but every once in a while the characters themselves would deliver a self- descriptive monologue in the third person. It felt odd, but it was Galati sticking within Murakami’s guidelines.
The two musicians on stage throughout the 90 minutes were fantastic. A violin and a bass clarinet. Five actors total (including a little girl), switched characters as the play jumped between stories, including the role of narrator. The set was spare and seemed to catch an appropriate Murakami mood. The actors were decent, but I was distracted by some of the delivery.
Not the most amazing thing I’ve experienced, but I’m glad I went. Theater helps you look at a storyline from a different view. For example, when reading “Honey Pie” I did not pay much attention to the story of the bears and consider what that story within meant to the overall story. But the play got me thinking…
“I'll have grounds/ More relative than this – the play's the thing/ Wherein I'll catch the conscience of the King.”
I would recommend this play for lovers of the novelist – or rather, I’d recommend reading the short stories and then going to the play, because it is impossible not to appreciate Murakami.